By Finn Laursen
The Lisbon Treaty, which got here into strength in December 2009, goals to make the ecu Union either extra effective and legit. new vital posts have been created; an elected President of the eu Council and a excessive consultant (HR) of the Union for international and safety coverage who can be a Vice-President of the fee. top overseas students were amassed jointly to envision the institutional offerings and suggestions of the Lisbon Treaty and talk about the most probably results of those alterations. Will the adjustments meet the declared objectives of a extra effective and democratic Union with a view to enable the ecu to behave the world over with better coherence and potency? If associations subject, how a lot do they topic? How major is the Lisbon Treaty? what sort of management might be to be had within the post-Lisbon european?
Read Online or Download The EU's Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation PDF
Similar government books
Someday within the 18th century, the be aware equality won flooring as a political excellent, however the proposal was once constantly obscure. during this treatise, Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn argues that it lowered to 1 easy and intensely risky thought: equality of political strength as embodied in democracy. He marshals the most powerful attainable case that democratic equality is the very foundation now not of liberty, as is usually believed, however the overall country.
From the refusal of the U. S. Congress to approve fast-track exchange authority and sure overseas reduction programs to the stumbling blocks positioned through Western ecu parliaments within the course of financial integration, legislatures frequently intervene with nationwide leaders' efforts to arrive and enforce predictable overseas agreements.
Content material: bankruptcy One The altering South (pages 5–22): Jeff WoodsChapter LBJ in the home and Senate (pages 23–37): Donald A. RitchieChapter 3 The Vice Presidency (pages 38–56): Marc J. SelverstoneChapter 4 woman chicken Johnson (pages 57–75): Lisa M. BurnsChapter 5 administration and imaginative and prescient (pages 76–90): Sean J.
The Lisbon Treaty, which got here into strength in December 2009, goals to make the ecu Union either extra effective and bonafide. new vital posts have been created; an elected President of the ecu Council and a excessive consultant (HR) of the Union for international and defense coverage who can be a Vice-President of the fee.
- Government finance statistics yearbook, Volume 29
- The Promise of Power: The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan
- India Express: The Future of a New Superpower
- The challenge of democratic representation in the European Union
- It Is Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom
- The Policy and Politics of Food Stamps and SNAP
Extra resources for The EU's Lisbon Treaty: Institutional Choices and Implementation
The EU context is that of the EU’s special relations with the 79 African, Pacific and Caribbean (APC) states, covered by the Cotonou Agreement signed in 2000. The Cotonou Agreement replaced the Lomé Agreement and needed to be adapted to the multilateral trade regime of the World Trade Organization (WTO) that emerged after the Uruguay Round. The EU came up with EPAs, bilateral free trade agreements between the EU and various regions among the ACPs, as the solution to the compatibility problem. Many ACPs have been very critical of this EU approach.
2008. Foreign Policy Aspects of the Lisbon Treaty. Third Report of Session 2007–08. London: The Stationary Office Limited. ) 2008. Lissabon in der Analyse: Der Reformvertrag der Europäishen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Wessels, Wolfgang and Bopp, Franziska 2008. The Institutional Architecture of CFSP after the Lisbon Treaty – Constitutional Breakthrough or Challenges Ahead? Challenge Research Paper, No. 10 (June). Available at: http://www. pdf [accessed: 15 June 2010]. Wouters, Jan, Coppens, Dominic and De Meester, Bart 2008.
Hence, the ‘ever closer union’ as a moving target of European integration has led to disagreement – if not confusion – within academia. 4 Through the years, the debate has become more diverse, evolving from a ‘tradeoff’ analysis to addressing the overlap. Wallace (2007) posits that supranationalism is to a large extent intergovernmentalism in disguise: ‘The original European Communities represented a negotiated compromise, in which rhetorical commitment to integration, even to eventual federation, was intertwined with the promotion and protection of national interests’.